Skip to main content
Article
Influence of Differential Calcification in the Descending Thoracic Aorta on Aortic Pulse Pressure
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
  • Mirza Mujadil Ahmad, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Syed Haris Ahmed Pir, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Mustafa Noor Muhammad, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Sharmeen Hussaini, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Immad Arif Kiani, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Mirza Nubair Ahmad, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Imaad Razzaque, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Muhammad Nabeel Syed, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Rafath Ullah, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Suhail Allaqaband, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Anjan Gupta, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Steven C. Port, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Centers
  • Khawaja Afzal Ammar, Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke's Medical Centers
Publication Date
8-10-2017
Keywords
  • thoracic aortic,
  • calcification,
  • pulse pressure,
  • compliance,
  • computed tomography
Abstract

Purpose: Multiple studies have shown pulse pressure (PP) to be a strong predictor of aortic calcification. However, no studies are available that correlate PP with aortic calcification at the segmental level.

Methods: We identified 37 patients with aortic PP measured during cardiac catheterization. Their noncontrast chest computed tomography scans were evaluated for the presence of calcium in different segments (ascending aorta, arch of aorta [arch], descending aorta) and quantified. Patients with calcification (Calcified Group A) were compared against patients without calcification (Noncalcified Group B) in terms of PP, calcification and compliance.

Results: The mean of the total calcium score was higher in the descending aorta than the arch or ascending aorta (691 vs 571 vs 131, respectively, P < 0.0001). PP had the strongest correlation with calcification in the descending aorta (r = 0.47, P = 0.004). Calcified Group A had a much higher PP than Noncalcified Group B, with the greatest difference in the descending aorta (20 mmHg, P < 0.0001), lesser in the ascending aorta (10 mmHg, P = 0.12) and the least in the arch (5 mmHg, P = 0.38). Calcified Group A patients also had much lower compliance than Noncalcified Group B patients, with the greatest difference among groups seen in the descending aorta (0.7 mL/mmHg, P = 0.002), followed by the ascending aorta, then arch.

Conclusions: These are the first data to evaluate the relative impact of aortic segments in PP. Finding the greatest amount of calcification along with greatest change in PP and compliance in the descending aorta makes a case that the descending aorta plays a major role in PP as compared to other segments of the thoracic aorta.

Citation Information

Ahmad MM, Pir SHA, Muhammad MN, Hussaini S, Kiani IA, Ahmad MN, Razzaque I, Syed MN, Ullah R, Allaqaband S, Gupta A, Port SC, Ammar KA. Influence of differential calcification in the descending thoracic aorta on aortic pulse pressure. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017;4:104-13. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1448