Skip to main content
Article
Comparison of 3-Drug Versus 4-Drug and PI Versus Non-PI Combinations as Initial HAART: Experience from 1998 to 2007
Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (2009)
  • Malhar A. Jhaveri, University of Kentucky
  • Steven R. Browning, University of Kentucky
  • Heather Bush, University of Kentucky
  • Alice Thornton, University of Kentucky
  • Richard N. Greenberg, University of Kentucky
Abstract
Although established in controlled studies that there is no advantage to 4-drug highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) or regimens with or without protease inhibitors (PIs), we questioned this finding in a clinical setting (ie, no inclusion criteria). Ours is a single clinic retrospective study including all participants >18 years of age during their first year of HAART. A total of 190 participants were reviewed, with 168 (88%) attaining a viral load <400 copies>/mL at the end of a year of HAART; 144 of 164 (88%) succeeded with 3 drugs and 24 of 26 (92%) with 4 drugs (P = .51). In all, 59 of 71 (83%) succeeded using a PI versus 109 of 119 (92%) without a PI (P = .08). Male gender and exposure time to HAART were significant variables for a successful outcome. Failures were due to side effects (50%), nonadherence (45%), and drug allergy (5%). Our results support current guidelines recommending 3-drug HAART.
Keywords
  • Protease inhibitors,
  • HIV,
  • Treatment naive,
  • nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
Disciplines
Publication Date
September, 2009
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1545109709345666
Citation Information
Malhar A. Jhaveri, Steven R. Browning, Heather Bush, Alice Thornton, et al.. "Comparison of 3-Drug Versus 4-Drug and PI Versus Non-PI Combinations as Initial HAART: Experience from 1998 to 2007" Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care Vol. 8 Iss. 5 (2009) p. 299 - 307
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/steven_browning/8/