Skip to main content
Article
Elementary Statistical Methods and Measurement Error
The American Statistician
  • Stephen B. Vardeman, Iowa State University
  • Joanne Wendelberger, Los Alamos National Laboratory
  • Tom Burr, Los Alamos National Laboratory
  • Michael S. Hamada, Los Alamos National Laboratory
  • Leslie M. Moore, Los Alamos National Laboratory
  • Marcus Jobe, Miami University
  • Max Morris, Iowa State University
  • Huaiqing Wu, Iowa State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Version
Accepted Manuscript
Publication Date
1-1-2010
DOI
10.1198/tast.2009.09079
Abstract

How the sources of physical variation interact with a data collection plan determines what can be learned from the resulting dataset, and in particular, how measurement error is reflected in the dataset. The implications of this fact are rarely given much attention in most statistics courses. Even the most elementary statistical methods have their practical effectiveness limited by measurement variation; and understanding how measurement variation interacts with data collection and the methods is helpful in quantifying the nature of measurement error. We illustrate how simple one- and two-sample statistical methods can be effectively used in introducing important concepts of metrology and the implications of those concepts when drawing conclusions from data.

Comments

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The American Statistician on January 1, 2012, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1198/tast.2009.09079.

Copyright Owner
American Statistical Association
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Stephen B. Vardeman, Joanne Wendelberger, Tom Burr, Michael S. Hamada, et al.. "Elementary Statistical Methods and Measurement Error" The American Statistician Vol. 64 Iss. 1 (2010) p. 46 - 51
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/stephen_vardeman/18/