Skip to main content
Comparison of Methods Used to Predict the Burn Injuries in Tests of Thermal Protective Fabrics
Journal of ASTM International (2005)
  • Guowen Song, North Carolina State University
  • R. Barker, North Carolina State University
  • D. R. Grimes, North Carolina State University
  • D. Thompson, North Carolina State University
A study was conducted to compare the two methods, Henriques Burn Integral and Stoll criteria, in thermal protective performance evaluation on firefighter clothing composites exposed to various thermal hazards. The thermal hazards that the firefighter may encounter during fire fighting are low level thermal radiation and high intensity flashover fire. With the simulation of these thermal hazards in the lab, the heat flux behind exposed clothing composites are characterized with flux rise rate and peak heat flux. Comparisons were performed on the prediction differences of clothing system made using Henriques Burn integral and Stoll criteria under different conditions. The study demonstrated that in some cases less difference is predicted by the two methods, while in other cases a significant difference is observed. Several recommendations were made for the qualitative prediction of garment and fabric thermal protective performance under different situations.
  • thermal protective performance,
  • radiant protective performance,
  • Henriques Burn Integral,
  • Stoll criteria,
  • thermal radiation,
  • flash fire,
  • TPP,
  • RPP
Publication Date
February, 2005
Publisher Statement
Copyright © 2005 by ASTM International. Posted with permission.
Citation Information
Guowen Song, R. Barker, D. R. Grimes and D. Thompson. "Comparison of Methods Used to Predict the Burn Injuries in Tests of Thermal Protective Fabrics" Journal of ASTM International Vol. 2 Iss. 2 (2005) p. 1 - 11 ISSN: 1546-962X
Available at: