Skip to main content
Article
Meat's Place on the Campaign Menu: How U.S. Environmental Discourse Negotiates Vegetarianism
Communication Faculty Publications
  • Carrie Packwood Freeman, Georgia State University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2010
Abstract
Given the impact of America’s food choices, particularly animal-based foods, on life-sustaining systems, to what extent is the environmental movement making meat-based diets an issue? This research analyzes websites of 15 U.S. environmental advocacy organizations (EOs) to examine how they negotiate the question of animal versus plant-based diets and propose solutions for food producers and consumers. EOs proposed that industrial agriculture and commercial fishing/aquaculture severely limit destructive practices to more sustainably meet consumer demand for animal products. EOs offered consumers choices, including: 1) replacement of much industrial food with local, organic, and/or sustainable animal or plant foods, 2) reduction of animal products, and, to a lesser degree, 3) vegetarianism. To consistently promote justice for all animals, the author recommends environmental discourse more explicitly critique animal agriculture/fishing as a primary source of environmental problems, consider food needs not just preferences, and promote fundamental changes toward a plant-based, largely organic diet.
Comments

This is a postprint version of an article published as:

Freeman, C. P. (2010). Meat's place on the campaign menu: How U.S. environmental discourse negotiates vegetarianism. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4(3), 255-276. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2010.501998

Copyright © 2010 Taylor & Francis.

Citation Information
Carrie Packwood Freeman. "Meat's Place on the Campaign Menu: How U.S. Environmental Discourse Negotiates Vegetarianism" (2010)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/carrie_freeman/3/