Skip to main content
Article
Getting a Sharper View of the Humanitarian Marketplace: Introducing Conduit Engagement Theory
Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations (2018)
  • Joseph Bock, Kennesaw State University
  • Ziaul Haque
Abstract
There are differing views on the strengths and weaknesses of faith-based organizations relative to secular international nongovernmental organizations. This article argues that the theory of comparative advantage and the theory of organizational alignment are inadequate in helping to assess these strengths and weaknesses. The article offers a different perspective, called conduit engagement theory. It holds that humanitarian organizations naturally have specific relationships, organizational linkages, affiliations, or shared philosophies (referred to in the article as conduits) that enable certain programmatic interventions. Maximum effectiveness within the humanitarian marketplace is a function of the robustness of engagement of conduits with high-priority initiatives that have adequate funding over the necessary length of time. A new kind of tool for strategic planning within specific countries and for auditing at an organizational level are proposed.
Keywords
  • nongovernmental organizations,
  • faith-based organizations,
  • strategic planning,
  • humanitarian
Publication Date
December, 2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02404004
Citation Information
Download Bock, J. G., & Haque, Z. (2018). Getting a Sharper View of the Humanitarian Marketplace: Introducing Conduit Engagement Theory, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 24(4), 517-535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02404004