Skip to main content
Article
Psychiatry’s thirty-five-year, non-empirical reach for biological explanations
Psychology Faculty Research
  • W. Joseph Wyatt, Marshall University
  • Donna M. Midkiff, Marshall University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2007
Abstract
This is our third article in a series that began with a special issue of Behavior and Social Issues in 2006. Here we briefly review our central points from the first two articles. First is that over the past thirty-five years, claims of biological causation of mental and behavioral disorders have gone well beyond the research data, for reasons that are largely related to psychiatry’s lost esteem and protection of its “turf,” as well as to the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry. Our second position is that claims of psychotropic drugs’ effectiveness have been overstated. We respond, as well, to the protestations of Professor Jerome C. Wakefield who defends biological psychiatry. We also provide an update on relevant events within the drug industry since our last article in this series.
Comments

Published by the University of Illinois at Chicago Library.

The version of record is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v16i2.1874

Copyright ©2007 W. Joseph Wyatt & Donna M. Midkiff. Readers of this article may copy it without the copyright owner’s permission, if the author and publisher are acknowledged in the copy and the copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes.

Citation Information
Wyatt, W. J., & Midkiff, D. M. (2007). Psychiatry’s thirty-five-year, non-empirical reach for biological explanations. Behavior and Social Issues, 16(2), 197-213.