Skip to main content
Comments on "Failures in detecting volcanic ash from a satellite-based technique"
Remote Sensing of Environment
  • A. J. Prata, CSIRO Atmospheric Research
  • William I. Rose, Michigan Technological University
  • Gregg J. Bluth, Michigan Technological University
  • Dave Schneider, US Geological Survey
  • Andrew Tupper, Bureau of Meteorology
Document Type
Publication Date
The recent paper by Simpson et al. [Remote Sens. Environ. 72 (2000) 191.] on failures to detect volcanic ash using the ‘reverse absorption’ technique provides a timely reminder of the danger that volcanic ash presents to aviation and the urgent need for some form of effective remote detection. The paper unfortunately suffers from a fundamental flaw in its methodology and numerous errors of fact and interpretation. For the moment, the ‘reverse’ absorption technique provides the best means for discriminating volcanic ash clouds from meteorological clouds. The purpose of our comment is not to defend any particular algorithm; rather, we point out some problems with Simpson et al.'s analysis and re-state the conditions under which the ‘reverse’ absorption algorithm is likely to succeed.
Publisher's Statement

© 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. Publisher's version of record:

Citation Information
A. J. Prata, William I. Rose, Gregg J. Bluth, Dave Schneider, et al.. "Comments on "Failures in detecting volcanic ash from a satellite-based technique"" Remote Sensing of Environment Vol. 78 Iss. 3 (2001) p. 341 - 346
Available at: