Transcript:
Listen to today's Commentary
Introduction:
Who speaks best for health care: Paul Martin or the provincial premiers?
Vivian McAlister is a transplant surgeon and a professor of surgery in
London, Ontario. On Commentary, he says move over Ottawa..the provinces
should take the lead in improving medicare.
Vivian McAlister:
During last month's election campaign Paul Martin set himself up as the
saviour of medicare. He was reinforcing an old theme: that Ottawa must keep a
close eye on the provinces lest they experiment - looking for different ways
to provide health care.
The prime minister conveniently ignored the fact that his 1995 budget that
stripped billions of dollars from health care did more damage to the system
than any province. Nor did he recognize that it's the provinces that are the
truly creative force in the delivery of health care.
I'm a doctor. I've worked in small and large hospitals in several provinces.
Before I came to Canada, I practised in the British National Health system
and in the Irish two-tier system. And I can tell you Canadian health care is
second to none. We provide the best care to the most people, regardless of
income or remoteness of residence, and it was the provinces that brought us
here. Saskatchewan led the way with public health insurance. The portability
and universal access provisions of the Canada Health Act ensure that
provincially-delivered health care is practical in a modern Canada.
Today portability allows patients to go from one province to another in
search of the best medical care. The resulting competition among provinces
provides a stimulus for continuous growth. When one province provides a new
type of surgery or pays for a new treatment, other provinces are eventually
forced to follow suit. It's the one difference that allows the Canadian
system to succeed where the centralized British system has failed.
The ironic result of the budget cuts of 1995 was to impose greater
uniformity on the system. The loss of innovation was worse than the actual
loss of funds. Mr. Martin's platform, now and at the next election, should
be to facilitate health-care delivery by the provinces. The people of the
provinces will deal with their own governments if the delivery is flawed.
Canada's flaw is that the federal government collects the taxes that should
be going to the provinces for health-care delivery. This anomaly restricts
Ottawa's health care spending to trendy capital budgets and diverts money
from desperately needed operating funds.
Instead of imposing uniformity, why doesn't Ottawa enable the spending of
revenues on health-care delivery that could spawn more innovation at the
provincial level. It could help Ontario, for example, meet the challenge of
its new health-care premium by offering a federal tax credit to offset the
cost to individuals. In this way Mr. Martin might build his legacy by
finding a way for provincialism to flourish in the Canadian confederation.
It is, after all, how the Liberal Party started.
For Commentary, I'm Vivian McAlister in London.