Skip to main content
Article
Traditional Martial Arts versus Modern Self-Defense Training for Women: Some Comments
Aggression and Violent Behavior
  • Amy J. Angleman, Nova Southeastern University
  • Yoshihiko Shinzato, Shinjinbukan Shorin Ryu Karate
  • Vincent B. Van Hasselt, Nova Southeastern University
  • Stephen A Russo, Nova Southeastern University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-1-2009
Disciplines
Abstract/Excerpt

Most research conducted on women's self-protection strategies has focused on modern self-defense training, as opposed to traditional martial arts instruction. Further, traditional martial arts’ training has been characterized by many as less useful for women than modern self-defense instruction. However, no investigations have compared the effectiveness of these two approaches. Several misconceptions concerning traditional martial arts may explain why this form of self-protection has not been utilized as often, or evaluated as frequently, as other methods. This paper: (1) distinguishes traditional martial arts from modern self-defense training, (2) reviews research that has assessed behavioral outcomes of self-defense training strategies, and (3) discusses factors that influence perceptions and efficacy of such programs. To assist in these efforts, we include the expertise and perspectives of an internationally-recognized grandmaster in the Okinawan martial art of Shorin Ryu Karate. Suggestions for directions that future research in this area might take are offered.

DOI
10.1016/j.avb.2008.12.001
Citation Information
Amy J. Angleman, Yoshihiko Shinzato, Vincent B. Van Hasselt and Stephen A Russo. "Traditional Martial Arts versus Modern Self-Defense Training for Women: Some Comments" Aggression and Violent Behavior Vol. 14 Iss. 2 (2009) p. 89 - 93 ISSN: 1359-1789
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/vincent-vanhasselt/395/