Skip to main content
Article
Is Aerosol Geoengineering Ethically Preferable to Other Climate Change Strategies?
Ethics and the Environment
  • Toby Svoboda, Fairfield University
Document Type
Article
Article Version
Post-print
Publication Date
1-1-2012
Abstract
In this paper, I address the question of whether aerosol geoengineering (AG) ought to be deployed as a response to climate change. First, I distinguish AG from emissions mitigation, adaptation, and other geoengineering strategies. Second, I discuss advantages and disadvantages of AG, including its potential to result in substantial harm to some persons. Third, I critique three arguments against AG deployment, suggesting reasons why these arguments should be rejected. Fourth, I consider an argument that, in scenarios in which all available climate change strategies would result in net harm to persons, we ought to adopt that response to climate change which would result in the least net harm. --Author's Description
Comments

Copyright 2012 Indiana University Press. A post-print has been archived here with permission from the copyright holder.

Published Citation
Svoboda, Toby (2012). Is Aerosol Geoengineering Ethically Preferable to Other Climate Change Strategies? Ethics and the Environment Vol. 17 No. 2. pg 111-135.
None
Peer Reviewed
Citation Information
Toby Svoboda. "Is Aerosol Geoengineering Ethically Preferable to Other Climate Change Strategies?" Ethics and the Environment Vol. 17 Iss. 2 (2012)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/toby-svoboda/1/