Skip to main content
Article
Understanding conflict avoidance : relationship, motivations, actions, and consequences
International Journal of Conflict Management
  • Dean William TJOSVOLD, Lingnan University, Hong Kong
  • Haifa F. SUN, Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Document Type
Journal article
Publication Date
4-1-2002
Abstract
Because of their relationship-oriented values, avoiding conflict is thought to be particularly prevalent and appropriate in collectivist societies like China. Although research in the West has assumed that avoiding conflict is one approach and a largely ineffective one, collectivists may use conflict avoidance in different ways, including protecting the other protagonist. Eighty-five managers and employees in six State Owned Enterprises in South China described concrete incidents when they avoided conflict and responded to specific items to measure the prior relationship, motivation, strategies, and consequences. Results identify major motivations and strategies used in conflict avoidance. Findings indicate that Chinese managers and employees relied upon the other person, promoted task productivity, and strengthened the relationship when they had a prior strong relationship and cooperative goals. Cooperative goals and fear of revenge were both found to underlie outflanking (trying to work around the other). Results were interpreted as indicating that avoiding conflict can be useful and even reaffirm an already effective relationship, but like open conflict, it must be managed constructively.
DOI
10.1108/eb022872
Scopus EID
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0036963625&doi=10.1108%2feb022872&partnerID=40&md5=c4c2f00426787c8209b66d1b53032fa7
E-ISSN
17588545
Publisher Statement

Copyright © 2002 Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.

Full-text Version
Publisher’s Version
Citation Information
Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. F. (2002). Understanding conflict avoidance: Relationship, motivations, actions, and consequences. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(2), 142-164. doi: 10.1108/eb022872