Skip to main content
Article
Evaluating scholarly book publishers—a case study in the field of journalism.
Faculty Publications
  • Tina M. Neville
  • Deborah Boran Henry
SelectedWorks Author Profiles:

Deborah Henry

Tina Neville

Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2014
Date Issued
2014-08-08
Abstract
By adapting multiple metrics used for journal article evaluation and replicating recent publisher metrics, the authors tested methods for evaluating scholarly book publishers. Using monographs published in journalism between 2007 and 2011 as a test case, results indicate these methods may be useful to other scholarly disciplines.
Comments

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in The Journal of Academic Librarianship. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 40, issue 3-4, 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.05.005. Members of the USF System may access the final version in the authenticated link.

Language
en_US
Publisher
Elsevier
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Citation Information
Neville, T.M., & Henry, D.B. (2014). Evaluating scholarly book publishers--a case study in the field of journalism. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, 379-387. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.05.005