Skip to main content
Other
Young Children's Competency to Take the Oath: Effects of Task, Maltreatment, and Age
University of Southern California Legal Studies Working Paper Series
  • Thomas D. Lyon, University of Southern California
  • Nathalie Carrick, University of California, Irvine
  • J A Quas, University of California, Irvine
Comments
In press, Law & Human Behavior. This paper can be downloaded at http://works.bepress.com/thomaslyon/62/
Abstract

This study examined maltreated and non-maltreated children’s (N = 183) emerging understanding of “truth” and “lie,” terms about which they are quizzed in order to qualify as competent to testify. Four- to six-year-old children were asked to accept or reject true and false (T/F) statements, label T/F statements as the “truth” or “a lie,” label T/F statements as “good” or “bad,” and label “truth” and “lie” as “good” or “bad.” The youngest children were at ceiling in accepting/rejecting T/F statements. The labeling tasks revealed improvement with age and children performed similarly across the tasks. Most children were better able to evaluate “truth” than “lie.” Maltreated children exhibited somewhat different response patterns, suggesting greater sensitivity to the immorality of lying.

Date of this Version
5-15-2009
Citation Information
Thomas D. Lyon, Nathalie Carrick and J A Quas. "Young Children's Competency to Take the Oath: Effects of Task, Maltreatment, and Age" (2009)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/thomaslyon/113/