Context: In children, bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are affected by height status. No consensus exists on how to adjust BMC or BMD (BMC/BMD) measurements for short or tall stature.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare various methods to adjust BMC/BMD for height in healthy children.
Design: Data from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study (BMDCS) were used to develop adjustment methods that were validated using an independent cross-sectional sample of healthy children from the Reference Data Project (RDP).
Setting: We conducted the study in five clinical centers in the United States.
Participants: We included 1546 BMDCS and 650 RDP participants (7 to 17 yr of age, 50% female).
Intervention: No interventions were used.
Main Outcome Measures: We measured spine and whole body (WB) BMC and BMD Z-scores for age (BMC/BMDage), height age (BMC/BMDheight age), height (BMCheight), bone mineral apparent density (BMADage), and height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) (BMC/BMDhaz).
Results: Spine and WB BMC/BMDageZ and BMADageZ were positively (P < 0.005; r = 0.11 to 0.64) associated with HAZ. Spine BMDhaz and BMChazZ were not associated with HAZ; WB BMChazZ was modestly associated with HAZ (r = 0.14; P = 0.0003). All other adjustment methods were negatively associated with HAZ (P < 0.005; r = −0.20 to −0.34). The deviation between adjusted and BMC/BMDage Z-scores was associated with age for most measures (P < 0.005) except for BMC/BMDhaz.
Conclusions: Most methods to adjust BMC/BMD Z-scores for height were biased by age and/or HAZ. Adjustments using HAZ were least biased relative to HAZ and age and can be used to evaluate the effect of short or tall stature on BMC/BMD Z-scores. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: 1265–1273, 2010)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/thomas_hangartner/45/