Skip to main content
Article
How Great is G.R.E.A.T.?: Results from a Quasi-experimental Design
Criminology & Public Policy (2001)
  • Terrance J. Taylor, University of Missouri-St. Louis
  • Finn-Aage Esbensen, University of Missouri–St. Louis
  • D. Wayne Osgood, Pennsylvania State University
  • Dana Peterson, University of Nebraska Omaha
  • Adrienne Freng, University of Wyoming
Abstract
Research Summary: This manuscript presents results from the National Evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) program, a school-based prevention program targeting middle-school students. A longitudinal quasi-experimental research design was conducted from 1995 through 1999. Beneficial program effects emerged gradually over time so that there was, on average, more pro-social change in the attitudes of G.R.E.A.T. students than the non-G.R.E.A.T. students four years following program exposure. Policy Implications: Two specific policy recommendations stem from this research. First, law enforcement officers can be effective providers of school-based prevention programs. Second, to better assess program effectiveness, evaluations should include design features that allow for assessment of long-term or delayed program effects.
Publication Date
2001
Citation Information
Terrance J. Taylor, Finn-Aage Esbensen, D. Wayne Osgood, Dana Peterson, et al.. "How Great is G.R.E.A.T.?: Results from a Quasi-experimental Design" Criminology & Public Policy Vol. 1 Iss. 1 (2001) p. 87 - 118
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/terrance-taylor/32/