Skip to main content
Human Geography, Ideology and Institutional Normativity
Dialogues in Human Geography (2011)
  • Keiron Bailey, University of Kentucky
  • Theodore H. Grossardt, University of Kentucky
In response to Woods and Gardner’s (2011) article we note a number of points of agreement. These include the need to engage and collaborate with formal institutional representatives and structures even under less than ideal conditions, for example involving our lack of ability to deliver meaningful products in accord with stated (rhetorical) aims. In this way, we may ensure presentation of data and methods that may be otherwise plausibly deniable. However, we would like to raise the question of how broader societal aims might be better identified and served, and of how we as human geographers might work within the often random, and sometimes contradictory, environment of the academic-industrial complex to encourage such progress. We outline examples from our experience on large-scale projects in contested domains which highlight the need for human geographers to maintain multiple positionalities within democratic systems.
  • institutional recalcitrance,
  • metrics,
  • Peet,
  • stakeholders
Publication Date
July, 2011
Citation Information
Keiron Bailey and Theodore H. Grossardt. "Human Geography, Ideology and Institutional Normativity" Dialogues in Human Geography Vol. 1 Iss. 2 (2011)
Available at: