Skip to main content
Article
2-year outcomes after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • John K Forrest, Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Surgery (Cardiac Surgery), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. Electronic address: john.k.forrest@yale.edu.
  • G Michael Deeb, Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Steven J Yakubov, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Riverside Methodist-OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Joshua D Rovin, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater, Florida, USA.
  • Mubashir Mumtaz, Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Wormleyburg, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Wormleyburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Hemal Gada, Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Wormleyburg, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle, Wormleyburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Daniel O'Hair, Advocate Aurora Health
  • Tanvir Bajwa, Advocate Aurora Health
  • Paul Sorajja, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Minneapolis Heart Institute-Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • John C Heiser, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
  • William Merhi, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
  • Abeel Mangi, Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Surgery (Cardiac Surgery), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Douglas J Spriggs, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater, Florida, USA.
  • Neal S Kleiman, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Houston Methodist-DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist-DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Stanley J Chetcuti, Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Paul S Teirstein, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA.
  • George L Zorn, Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
  • Peter Tadros, Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
  • Didier Tchétché, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
  • Jon R Resar, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Antony Walton, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Thomas G Gleason, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Basel Ramlawi, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Valley Health System, Winchester, Virginia, USA.
  • Ayman Iskander, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Saint Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, New York, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saint Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, New York, USA.
  • Ronald Caputo, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Saint Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, New York, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Saint Joseph's Hospital Health Center, Syracuse, New York, USA.
  • Jae K Oh, Division of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Jian Huang, Department of Statistics, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Michael J Reardon, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Houston Methodist-DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist-DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Affiliations

Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center

Scholarly Activity Date
3-8-2022
Abstract

Background: The Evolut Low Risk Trial (Medtronic Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients) showed that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a supra-annular, self-expanding valve was noninferior to surgery for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke at 2 years. This finding was based on a Bayesian analysis performed after 850 patients had reached 1 year of follow-up.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to report the full 2-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes for patients enrolled in the Evolut Low Risk Trial.

Methods: A total of 1,414 low-surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomized to receive TAVR or surgical AVR. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated adverse events, and a central echocardiographic core laboratory assessed hemodynamic endpoints.

Results: An attempted implant was performed in 730 TAVR and 684 surgical patients from March 2016 to May 2019. The Kaplan-Meier rates for the complete 2-year primary endpoint of death or disabling stroke were 4.3% in the TAVR group and 6.3% in the surgery group (P = 0.084). These rates were comparable to the interim Bayesian rates of 5.3% with TAVR and 6.7% with surgery (difference: -1.4%; 95% Bayesian credible interval: -4.9% to 2.1%). All-cause mortality rates were 3.5% vs 4.4% (P = 0.366), and disabling stroke rates were 1.5% vs 2.7% (P = 0.119), respectively. Between years 1 and 2, there was no convergence of the primary outcome curves.

Conclusions: The complete 2-year follow-up from the Evolut Low Risk Trial found that TAVR is noninferior to surgery for the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke, with event rates that were slightly better than those predicted by using the Bayesian analysis. (Medtronic Evolut Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients [Evolut Low Risk Trial]; NCT02701283).

Type
Article
PubMed ID
35241222
Citation Information

Forrest JK, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, et al. 2-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(9):882-896. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.062