Skip to main content
Article
Antecedents and Consequences of Fairness Perceptions in Personnel Selection A 3-Year Longitudinal Study
Group & Organization Management (2015)
  • Udo Konradt, Kiel University
  • Yvonne Garbers, Kiel University
  • Martina Böge, Kiel University
  • Berrin Erdogan, Portland State University
  • Talya N. Bauer, Portland State University
Abstract
Drawing on Gilliland’s selection fairness framework, we examined antecedents and behavioral effects of applicant procedural fairness perceptions before, during, and after a personnel selection procedure using a six-wave longitudinal research design. Results showed that both perceived post-test fairness and pre-feedback fairness perceptions are related to job offer acceptance and job performance after 18 months, but not to job performance after 36 months. Pre-test and post-test procedural fairness perceptions were mainly related to formal characteristics and interpersonal treatment, whereas pre-feedback fairness perceptions were related to formal characteristics and explanations. The impact of fairness attributes of formal characteristics and interpersonal treatment diminished over time, whereas attributes of explanation were only associated with pre-feedback fairness. Results are discussed in terms of theoretical implications for fairness research and for hiring organizations.
Disciplines
Publication Date
2015
DOI
10.1177/1059601115617665
Publisher Statement
© The Author(s) 2015. Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav 
Citation Information
Udo Konradt, Yvonne Garbers, Martina Böge, Berrin Erdogan, et al.. "Antecedents and Consequences of Fairness Perceptions in Personnel Selection A 3-Year Longitudinal Study" Group & Organization Management (2015) p. 1 - 34
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/talya_bauer/33/