Skip to main content
Redistributing Power in Mississippi: The Reversal of Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act
Ralph Bunche Journal of Public Affairs
  • Gloria J Billingsley, Jackson State University
  • Sylvester Murray, Jackson State University
Publication Date
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court declared Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 unconstitutional, essentially defanging preclearance requirements of Section 5 and leaving racial and other previously disenfranchised minorities unprotected. Using social contract theory as the theoretical framework, empirical field study research was used to examine whether the Voting Rights Act has achieved the results in Mississippi that the Supreme Court’s decision to revoke Section 4 has assumed. Data were collected on race-specific voter registration and voting data, measures of vote discrimination, litigations and Mississippi legislative activity regarding voting rights. Findings indicate that the gap between minority and non-minority voter registration and voting has improved. However, other measures of vote discrimination show that Mississippi has a higher noncompliance rate than any of the other 1965 covered jurisdictions. These findings suggest that the decision in Shelby v. Holder may be premature, particularly as it relates to Mississippi. A Congressional remedy is needed to ensure that Black Mississippians have unfettered opportunities to exercise their Constitutional right to vote and sustain the gains in political power resulting from the protection afforded under Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act.
Citation Information
Gloria J Billingsley and Sylvester Murray. "Redistributing Power in Mississippi: The Reversal of Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act" (2015)
Available at: