Post-print of: Hudson, P, Hudson, S, Kwan, T, Chan, C, Maclang-Vicencio, E, Ani, A-L 2015, 'Making connections within the Asia-Pacific region: case study around the Mentoring for Effective Teaching (MET) program', paper presented to Strengthening partnerships in teacher education: building community, connections and creativity: the annual conference of the Australian Teacher Education Association, Darwin, 8-10 July.
Making connections within the Asia-Pacific region: case study around the Mentoring for Effective Teaching (MET) programThe Annual Conference of the Australian Teacher Education Association on Strengthening Partnerships in Teacher Education: Building Community, Connections and Creativity
Document TypeConference publication
AbstractUniversity strategic plans emphasise the essential nature of partnerships at national and international levels. Along with establishing collaborative research partnerships, providing professional development to key stakeholders is considered a crucial activity for making and sustaining partnerships. Utilising knowledge from professional development in Australian contexts can be managed creatively for making connections internationally. Indeed, knowledge transfer is a cornerstone for the globalisation of education and needs to occur as a multiplex dialogue between participating countries. This paper presents a qualitative study around the Mentoring for Effective Teaching (MET) program, its growth and development nationally (e.g., scope and impact) along with insights into making connections within the Asia-Pacific region. At a national level, we outline how to facilitate a program though relationship building and face-to-face implementation of professional learning. Internationally, we highlight how to mould and shape Australian professional learning for the Asia-Pacific region, particularly with regard to facilitating fluid interactions within environments outside of Australia. The contexts for the study include a university in Hong Kong and another university in the Philippines. In this presentation, examples will be provided from the MET program to demonstrate contextual differences and similarities for implementation in Australian and Asian contexts. For instance, determining strategies for mentoring pedagogical knowledge can elicit viewpoints that align between cultures (e.g., use of specific teaching and questioning strategies) and also present alternative ideas as a result of cultural differences. We have learnt about having a structured program that draws on the research yet has sufficient flexibility to cater for cultures and contexts. With openmindedness, facilitating professional learning can become a two-way knowledge transfer, where learnings from other cultures and contexts can be refined for advancing programs in Australia.