Skip to main content
Pediatric audiology in North America: Current clinical practice and how it relates to the American Academy of Audiology pediatric amplification guideline
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
  • Sheila Moodie, The University of Western Ontario
  • Eileen Rall, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • Leisha Eiten, Boys Town National Research Hospital
  • George Lindley, Salus University
  • Dave Gordey, Oticon A/S, Denmark
  • Lisa Davidson, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
  • Marlene Bagatto, The University of Western Ontario
  • Susan Scollie, The University of Western Ontario
Document Type
Publication Date
URL with Digital Object Identifier

Background: There is broad consensus that screening and diagnosis of permanent hearing loss in children must beembedded within a comprehensive, evidence-based, family-centered intervention program. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for pediatric hearing assessment and hearing aid verification aim to reduce variability in practice and increase the use of effective evidence-based diagnostic and treatment options so that optimal outcomes may be achieved. To be of value, guidelines must be translated and implemented into practice and ongoing monitoring of their use in practice should occur. Purpose: This paper provides the results of two studies that aim to examine current pediatric audiology and amplification practice in North America. Research Design: A concurrent embedded mixed methods design was used. Study Sample: An electronic survey was distributed to North American audiologists who delivered pediatric audiology services with 350 audiologists participating in study 1 and 63 audiologists participating in study 2. Data Collection and Analysis: A quantitative approach was the predominant method of data collection. Respondents were prompted to provide additional qualitative text and detail regarding their quantitative response choice. This qualitative text was used during the analysis phase and combined with quantitative results to assist understanding of respondents' knowledge, skills, and barriers/facilitators to implement best practice in pediatric amplification. Results: Approximately 70% of audiologists reported using best-practice protocols for pediatric hearing aid fitting. Despite widespread knowledge and increased use of CPGs over the last 18 yrs, results of these studies show that variation in practice patterns continue to exist. Several examples of implementation challenges are discussed with recommendations provided. Conclusions: In order for audiologists working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing and their families to achieve the principles of family-centered early intervention, practice guidelines must continue to be developed, disseminated, and translated as they have a positive impact on the services provided. Researchers and clinical audiologists who deliver services must continue to collaborate to understand the "how" and "why" of implementing guidelines into practice and to identify the barriers/facilitators encountered in trying to do so.

Citation Information
Sheila Moodie, Eileen Rall, Leisha Eiten, George Lindley, et al.. "Pediatric audiology in North America: Current clinical practice and how it relates to the American Academy of Audiology pediatric amplification guideline" Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Vol. 27 Iss. 3 (2016) p. 166 - 187
Available at: