Skip to main content
Article
Development of a novel classification system for anatomical variants of the puboprostatic ligaments with expert validation
Canadian Urological Association Journal
  • Michael Kim, Western University
  • Shawna L. Boyle, Western University
  • Alfonso Fernandez, Western University
  • Edward D. Matsumoto, McMaster University
  • Kenneth T. Pace, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
  • Maurice Anidjar, School of Medicine
  • Gregory N. Kozak, University of Calgary
  • Sumit Davé, Western University
  • Blayne K. Welk, Western University
  • Marjorie I. Johnson, Western University
  • Stephen E. Pautler, Western University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-1-2014
URL with Digital Object Identifier
10.5489/cuaj.1797
Abstract

Introduction: We propose a novel classification system with a validation study to help clinicians identify and typify commonly seen variants of the puboprostatic ligaments (PPL). Methods: A preliminary dissection of 6 male cadavers and a prospective dataset of over 300 robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RARP) recorded on video were used to identify 4 distinct ligament types. Then the prospectively collected database of surgical videos was used to isolate images of the PPL from RARP. Over 300 surgical videos were reviewed and classified with 1 to 5 pictures saved for reference of the type of PPL. To validate the new classification system, we selected 5 independent, blinded expert robotic surgeons to classify 100 ligaments based on morphology into a 4-type system: parallel, V-shaped, inverted V-shape, and fused. One week later, a subset of 25 photographs was sent to the same experts and classified. Statistical analyses were performed to determine both the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the proposed system. Results: Inverted V-shaped ligaments were noted most frequently (29.97%), parallel and V-shaped ligaments were found at 19.19% and 11.11%, respectively and fused ligaments were noted less frequently (6.06%). There was good intra-rater agreement (ê = 0.66) and inter-rater agreement (ê = 0.67) for the classification system. Conclusions: This classification system provided standardized descriptions of ligament variations that could be adopted universally to help clinicians categorize the variants. The system, validated by several blinded expert surgeons, demonstrated that surgeons were able to learn and correctly classify the variants. The system may be useful in helping to predict peri- and postoperative outcomes; however, this will require further study.

Citation Information
Michael Kim, Shawna L. Boyle, Alfonso Fernandez, Edward D. Matsumoto, et al.. "Development of a novel classification system for anatomical variants of the puboprostatic ligaments with expert validation" Canadian Urological Association Journal Vol. 8 Iss. 11-12 (2014) p. 432 - 436
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/sumit-dave/14/