Skip to main content
Assessing the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of nursing outcomes classification in home care settings
Journal of nursing measurement
  • G. Keenan
  • J. Stocker
  • V. Barkauskas
  • M. Johnson
  • Meridean Maas, University of Iowa
  • Sue Moorhead, University of Iowa
  • D. Reed
Document Type
Peer Reviewed
Publication Date
NLM Title Abbreviation
J Nurs Meas
PubMed ID
The purpose of this study is to provide evidence of the validity, inter-rater reliability, and sensitivity of 36 clinically useful of Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) results for Home Care (HC) settings. The results of inter-rater reliability, criterion-related validity, and sensitivity evaluations of 36 NOC outcomes were compiled from a 10-site regional evaluation of the NOC. Findings of HC and all sites data were contrasted. More than 90% of the inter-rater reliability scores on the 36 NOC outcome label ratings were within one point, with a substantial number of absolute agreements. All but six of the criterion measures were significantly associated with the corresponding NOC outcomes, and most mean change scores were zero or positive. This was impressive evidence of the adequacy of these measures for reliable and valid use in practice.
  • Female,
  • Home Care Services/standards,
  • Humans,
  • Male,
  • Middle Aged,
  • Midwestern United States,
  • North America,
  • Nursing Assessment/standards,
  • Nursing Evaluation Research/methods,
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/classification/methods,
  • Reference Standards,
  • Sensitivity and Specificity,
  • Terminology as Topic,
  • Vocabulary,
  • Controlled
Published Article/Book Citation
Journal of nursing measurement, 11:2 (2003) pp.135-155.
Citation Information
G. Keenan, J. Stocker, V. Barkauskas, M. Johnson, et al.. "Assessing the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of nursing outcomes classification in home care settings" Journal of nursing measurement Vol. 11 Iss. 2 (2003) p. 135 - 155 ISSN: 1061-3749
Available at: