Skip to main content
Article
3. Clinical adequacy of NOC outcomes -- a report of field testing
Acendio 2002: Proceedings of the Special Conference of the Association of Common European Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes in Vienna.
  • Meridean Maas, University of Iowa
  • D. Reed
  • K. Reeder
  • P. Kerr
  • Janet K. Specht, University of Iowa
  • M. Johnson
  • Sue Moorhead, University of Iowa
Document Type
Contribution to Book
Peer Reviewed
1
Publication Date
1-1-2002
Keywords
  • Iowa Nursing Outcomes Classification -- Evaluation,
  • Field Studies,
  • Content Validity,
  • Expert Nurses,
  • Surveys,
  • Summated Rating Scaling,
  • Interrater Reliability,
  • Construct Validity,
  • Criterion-Related Validity,
  • Sensitivity and Specificity,
  • Data Collection Site,
  • Kappa Statistic,
  • Evaluation Research,
  • Validation Studies,
  • Psychometrics,
  • Biophysiological Methods,
  • Clinical Assessment Tools,
  • Psychological Tests,
  • Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk,
  • Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale,
  • Pain Measurement,
  • Scales,
  • Funding Source,
  • Human
Published Article/Book Citation
Acendio 2002: Proceedings of the Special Conference of the Association of Common European Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes in Vienna., : (2002) pp.45-64.
Disciplines
Citation Information
Meridean Maas, D. Reed, K. Reeder, P. Kerr, et al.. "3. Clinical adequacy of NOC outcomes -- a report of field testing" Acendio 2002: Proceedings of the Special Conference of the Association of Common European Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes in Vienna. (2002) p. 45 - 64
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/sue_moorhead/17/