"Did Congress Render the Minimal-Coverage Provision in the Affordable Care Act Unconstitutional When It Eliminated the Tax Penalty for Noncompliance, and, if So, Does the Provision's Unconstitutionality Render the Rest of the Act Unconstitutional, Too? (19-840) (19-1019), 48 Preview U.S. Sup. Ct. Cas. 35 (2020)" by Steven D. Schwinn

Article

Did Congress Render the Minimal-Coverage Provision in the Affordable Care Act Unconstitutional When It Eliminated the Tax Penalty for Noncompliance, and, if So, Does the Provision's Unconstitutionality Render the Rest of the Act Unconstitutional, Too? (19-840) (19-1019), 48 Preview U.S. Sup. Ct. Cas. 35 (2020)

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

Steven D. Schwinn, UIC John Marshall Law School

Find in your library

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2020

Disciplines

Citation Information

Steven D. Schwinn, Did Congress Render the Minimal-Coverage Provision in the Affordable Care Act Unconstitutional When It Eliminated the Tax Penalty for Noncompliance, and, if So, Does the Provision's Unconstitutionality Render the Rest of the Act Unconstitutional, Too? (19-840) (19-1019), 48 Preview U.S. Sup. Ct. Cas. 35 (2020)