"Did the Fifth Circuit Apply an Unduly Burdensome Standard When It Denied a Certificate of Appealability on a Motion to Reopen a Judgment and Obtain Merits Review on a Claim That Trial Counsel was Constitutionally Ineffective for Knowingly Presenting an Expert Who Testified the Defendant Was Likely to Be Dangerous in the Future because of His Race: Buck v. Davis (15-8049), 44 Preview of U.S. Sup. Ct. Cases 16 (2016)" by Steven D. Schwinn

Article

Did the Fifth Circuit Apply an Unduly Burdensome Standard When It Denied a Certificate of Appealability on a Motion to Reopen a Judgment and Obtain Merits Review on a Claim That Trial Counsel was Constitutionally Ineffective for Knowingly Presenting an Expert Who Testified the Defendant Was Likely to Be Dangerous in the Future because of His Race: Buck v. Davis (15-8049), 44 Preview of U.S. Sup. Ct. Cases 16 (2016)

ABA Preview of U.S. Sup. Ct. Cases (2016)

Steven D. Schwinn, John Marshall Law School

Find in your library

Disciplines

Publication Date

October 3, 2016

Citation Information

Steven D. Schwinn. "Did the Fifth Circuit Apply an Unduly Burdensome Standard When It Denied a Certificate of Appealability on a Motion to Reopen a Judgment and Obtain Merits Review on a Claim That Trial Counsel was Constitutionally Ineffective for Knowingly Presenting an Expert Who Testified the Defendant Was Likely to Be Dangerous in the Future because of His Race: Buck v. Davis (15-8049), 44 Preview of U.S. Sup. Ct. Cases 16 (2016)" ABA Preview of U.S. Sup. Ct. Cases (2016)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/steven_schwinn/189/