Skip to main content
Article
Comparison of temporary interruption with continuation of direct oral anticoagulants for low bleeding risk procedures
Thrombosis Research (2021)
  • Muhammad Adil Sheikh, University of Michigan
  • Xiaowen Kong, University of Michigan
  • Brian Haymart, University of Michigan
  • Scott Kaatz, Henry Ford Hospital
  • Gregory Krol, Henry Ford Hospital
  • Jay Kozlowski, Cardiology and Vascular Associates, Huron Valley-Sinai Hospital, Commerce, Township, MI, United States of America
  • Musa Dahu, Spectrum Health
  • Mona Ali, Beaumont Health
  • Steven Almany, Beaumont Health
  • Tina Alexandris-Souphis, University of Michigan
  • Eva Kline-Rogers, University of Michigan
  • James B. Froehlich, University of Michigan
  • Geoffrey D. Barnes, University of Michigan
Abstract
Introduction: Limited data is available on the rates of bleeding and thromboembolic events for patients undergoing low bleeding risk procedures while taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC).
Methods: Adults taking DOAC in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) database who underwent a low bleeding risk procedure between May 2015 and Sep 2019 were included. Thirty-day bleeding (of any severity), thromboembolic events, and death were compared between DOAC temporarily interrupted and continued uninterrupted groups. Adverse event rates were compared using an inverse probability weighting propensity score.
Results: There were 820 patients who underwent 1412 low risk procedures. DOAC therapy was temporarily interrupted in 371 (45.2%) patients (601 [42.6%] procedures) and continued uninterrupted in 449 (54.8%) patients (811 [57.4%] procedures). DOAC patients with temporary interruptions were more likely to have diabetes, prior stroke or TIA, prior bleeding, higher CHA2DS2-VASc, and higher modified HAS-BLED scores. DOAC interruption was common for gastrointestinal endoscopy, electrophysiology device implantation, and cardiac catheterization while it was less common for cardioversion, dermatologic procedures, and subcutaneous injection. After propensity score adjustment, bleeding risk was lower in the DOAC temporary interruption group (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.95) as compared to the group with continuous DOAC use. Rates of thromboembolic events and death did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Conclusions: DOAC-treated patients undergoing low bleeding risk procedures may experience lower rates of bleeding when DOAC is temporarily interrupted. Prospective studies focused on low bleeding risk procedures are needed to identify the safety DOAC management strategy.
Keywords
  • Bleeding,
  • Direct oral anticoagulants,
  • Low bleeding risk procedures,
  • Thromboembolism
Publication Date
April 19, 2021
DOI
10.1016/J.THROMRES.2021.04.006
Citation Information
Sheikh MA, Kong X, Haymart B, Kaatz S, Krol G, Kozlowski J, Dahu M, Ali M, Almany S, Alexandris-Souphis T, Kline-Rogers E, Froehlich JB, Barnes GD. Comparison of temporary interruption with continuation of direct oral anticoagulants for low bleeding risk procedures. Thromb Res. 2021 Apr 19;203:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.04.006. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33906063.