![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/pkNsKec8XqdPDp-lNars43kf0TE=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/87/6d/df/876ddfa6-50da-4ffa-a57a-c5c19a02241d/thumbnail_67448fa1-f402-4ae1-9640-cd63b7ab56de.jpg)
Article
Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Correlation functions for ionic motion from NMR relaxation and electrical conductivity in the glassy fast-ion conductor (Li2S)0.56(SiS2)0.44’ ’’
Physical Review B
Document Type
Article
Disciplines
Publication Date
5-1-1995
DOI
10.1103/PhysRevB.51.12003
Abstract
Hunt’s Comment criticizes our recent article for combining concepts from percolation theory and effective-medium theories to calculate the dc and ac conductivities in ionic conducting glasses. Our approach was an attempt to describe the dc and ac conductivity with input information from our NMR measurements. We used the continuous-time random-walk theory and reasonable assumptions for the glasses which yielded good fits of the dc and ac conductivities at many temperatures.
Copyright Owner
American Physical Society
Copyright Date
1995
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Ivar Svare, Ferdinando Borsa, D. R. Torgeson and Steve W. Martin. "Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Correlation functions for ionic motion from NMR relaxation and electrical conductivity in the glassy fast-ion conductor (Li2S)0.56(SiS2)0.44’ ’’" Physical Review B Vol. 51 Iss. 17 (1995) p. 12003 - 12004 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/steve_martin/19/
This article is from Physical Review B 51 (1995): 12003–12004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.51.12003. Posted with permission.