Skip to main content
Article
Radical Reform of Intercollegiate Athletics: Antitrust and Public Policy Implications
Tulane Law Review
  • Stephen F. Ross, Penn State Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2012
Abstract
Universities operating major intercollegiate athletic programs are heading for, if not already in, a crisis. Corruption continues to affect major football and basketball programs, exacerbated by a failure of imagination and will in identifying and deterring corruption, and by a lack of consensus on what constitutes "corruption" when football and men's basketball stars generate millions of dollars but cannot enjoy a lifestyle commensurate with many peer students. Current levels of spending are nonsustainable at many schools. Even where intercollegiate athletic programs are sustained primarily by football and basketball revenues, otherwise visionary and questioning college presidents have yet to publicly question why these revenues should subsidize nonrevenue sports at the expense of financially pressed classroom activities. Contrary to the NCAA Constitution, major football programs do not operate "in keeping with prudent management and fiscal practices." This Essay sets forth an agenda for reform, explains why the agenda reflects sound public policy, and analyzes why and how the NCAA can implement the agenda in a manner consistent with the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Citation Information
Stephen F. Ross. "Radical Reform of Intercollegiate Athletics: Antitrust and Public Policy Implications" Tulane Law Review Vol. 86 (2012) p. 933
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/stephen_ross/28/