The Paradox of Balancing Significant InterestsHastings Law Journal (1994)
AbstractAddresses the changing constitutional discourse on the Court, argues that the justices have no choice but to balance rights and “interests” regardless of their verbal formulas, and explores the consequences of taking a principled approach to rights and interests.
- compelling interests,
- state action,
- decision theory,
- fundamental rights
Citation InformationStephen E. Gottlieb. "The Paradox of Balancing Significant Interests" Hastings Law Journal Vol. 45 (1994)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/stephen_gottlieb/15/