Skip to main content
Article
The Paradox of Balancing Significant Interests
Hastings Law Journal (1994)
  • Stephen E. Gottlieb, Albany Law School
Abstract
Addresses the changing constitutional discourse on the Court, argues that the justices have no choice but to balance rights and “interests” regardless of their verbal formulas, and explores the consequences of taking a principled approach to rights and interests.
Keywords
  • compelling interests,
  • state action,
  • decision theory,
  • fundamental rights
Disciplines
Publication Date
1994
Citation Information
Stephen E. Gottlieb. "The Paradox of Balancing Significant Interests" Hastings Law Journal Vol. 45 (1994)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/stephen_gottlieb/15/