Skip to main content
Article
Development and Validation of a Model to Determine Risk of Progression of Barrett's Esophagus to Neoplasia.
Gastroenterology
  • Sravanthi Parasa, Division of Gastroenterology, Swedish Medical Group, Seattle, Washington.
  • Sreekar Vennalaganti
  • Srinivas Gaddam
  • Prashanth Vennalaganti
  • Patrick Young
  • Neil Gupta
  • Prashanthi Thota
  • Brooks Cash
  • Sharad Mathur
  • Richard Sampliner
  • Fouad Moawad
  • David Lieberman
  • Ajay Bansal
  • Kevin F Kennedy
  • John Vargo
  • Gary Falk
  • Manon Spaander
  • Marco Bruno
  • Prateek Sharma
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-1-2018
Keywords
  • Adenocarcinoma,
  • Adult,
  • Aged,
  • Barrett Esophagus,
  • Biopsy,
  • Cigarette Smoking,
  • Databases, Factual,
  • Decision Support Techniques,
  • Disease Progression,
  • Esophageal Neoplasms,
  • Esophagoscopy,
  • Esophagus,
  • Female,
  • Humans,
  • Incidence,
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate,
  • Longitudinal Studies,
  • Male,
  • Middle Aged,
  • Neoplasm Grading,
  • Netherlands,
  • Predictive Value of Tests,
  • Proportional Hazards Models,
  • Reproducibility of Results,
  • Risk Assessment,
  • Risk Factors,
  • Sex Factors,
  • Time Factors,
  • United States
Disciplines
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A system is needed to determine the risk of patients with Barrett's esophagus for progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We developed and validated a model to determine of progression to HGD or EAC in patients with BE, based on demographic data and endoscopic and histologic findings at the time of index endoscopy.

METHODS: We performed a longitudinal study of patients with BE at 5 centers in United States and 1 center in Netherlands enrolled in the Barrett's Esophagus Study database from 1985 through 2014. Patients were excluded from the analysis if they had less than 1 year of follow-up, were diagnosed with HGD or EAC within the past year, were missing baseline histologic data, or had no intestinal metaplasia. Seventy percent of the patients were used to derive the model and 30% were used for the validation study. The primary outcome was development of HGD or EAC during the follow-up period (median, 5.9 years). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. We assigned a specific number of points to each BE risk factor, and point totals (scores) were used to create categories of low, intermediate, and high risk. We used Cox regression to compute hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals to determine associations between risk of progression and scores.

RESULTS: Of 4584 patients in the database, 2697 were included in our analysis (84.1% men; 87.6% Caucasian; mean age, 55.4 ± 20.1 years; mean body mass index, 27.9 ± 5.5 kg/m

CONCLUSIONS: We developed a scoring system (Progression in Barrett's Esophagus score) based on male sex, smoking, length of BE, and baseline low-grade dysplasia that identified patients with BE at low, intermediate, and high risk for HGD or EAC. This scoring system might be used in management of patients.

Clinical Institute
Cancer
Clinical Institute
Digestive Health
Specialty
Oncology
Specialty
Gastroenterology
Citation Information
Sravanthi Parasa, Sreekar Vennalaganti, Srinivas Gaddam, Prashanth Vennalaganti, et al.. "Development and Validation of a Model to Determine Risk of Progression of Barrett's Esophagus to Neoplasia." Gastroenterology (2018)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/sravanthi-parasa/89/