Skip to main content
Article
The pitfalls of poor psychometric properties : a rejoinder to Hofstede's reply to us
Applied Psychology: An International Review
  • Paul E. SPECTOR
  • Cary L. COOPER
  • Juan I. SANCHEZ
  • Kate SPARKS
  • André BÜSSING
  • Philip DEWE
  • Luo LU
  • Karen MILLER
  • Lucio Renault DE MORAES
  • Michael O'DRISCOLL
  • Milan PAGON
  • Horia PITARIU
  • Steven POELMANS
  • Phani RADHAKRISHNAN
  • Jesùs SALGADO
  • Oi Ling SIU, Lingnan University, Hong Kong
  • Jean Benjamin STORA
  • Peter VLERICK
  • Mina WESTMAN
  • Maria WIDERSZAL-BAZYL
  • Paul WONG
Document Type
Journal article
Publication Date
1-1-2002
Disciplines
Abstract
The article, “An International Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Hofstede Values Survey Module 1994: A Comparison of Individual and Country/Province Level Results”, was published in Applied Psychology: An International Review in April 2001. The article has elicited a response by Geert Hofstede. The authors have written a rejoinder to this response, and both are published in this section. One of our goals at Applied Psychology: An International Review is to facilitate debate and discussion. I hope this section will serve that purpose.
DOI
10.1111/1464-0597.00085
E-ISSN
14640597
Publisher Statement

Copyright © International Association for Applied Psychology, 2002

Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.

Full-text Version
Accepted Author Manuscript
Citation Information
Spector, P. E., Cooper, C. L., Sanchez, J. I., Sparks, K., Büssing, A., Philip, D,...Wong, P. (2002). The pitfalls of poor psychometric properties: A rejoinder to Hofstede's reply to us. Applied Psychology, 51(1), 174-178. doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00085