Skip to main content
Youtube and Eosinophilic Esophagitis: an Assessment of the Educational Quality of Information
Appalachian Student Research Forum
  • Apurva Bansal, East Tennessee State University
  • Keerthy Reddy, East Tennessee State University
  • Rufaat Mando, East Tennessee State University
  • S. Alvarez-Arango, Jacobi Medical Center, New York, NY
  • S. Reddy, University of Alabama
  • L. Cuervo-Pardo, Northwestern University
  • A. Malkani, East Tennessee State University
  • C. Reddy, East Tennessee State University
  • Shimin Zheng, East Tennessee State University
  • Mark Dula, East Tennessee State University
  • Claudia Kozinetz, East Tennessee State University
  • Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada, East Tennessee State University
Document Type
Publication Date
Date Range
Introduction: Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) is a rare allergic inflammatory disease affecting approximately 1-4 in every 10,000 individuals in the United States. With the dramatic increase in prevalence of EoE in recent years and the increasing use of the internet as a source of health care information, we sought to evaluate the educational quality of EoE videos on YouTube. Methods: We performed a YouTube search using the keyword “eosinophilic esophagitis” from September 8-27, 2016. All available videos were included and analyzed for video characteristics, source, and content. Source was further classified as health-care provider, alternative-medicine provider, patient and/or patient's parents, company, media, or professional society. A scoring system was created based on current guidelines to evaluate the quality of information (-10 to +30 points).Negative points were assigned for misleading information. Six blinded reviewers scored each video independently. Results: Two hundred and nine videos were analyzed, with a median of 507 views, 1 like, 0 dislikes, and 0 comments. More video presenters were male (50.9%), and the most commonly depicted race was Caucasian (73.6%). The most common type of video source was professional society (39.7%), and the least represented video source was company and media (8.6%). Among the four video sources, the mean scores showed a statistically significant difference from each other (pConclusion: Youtube videos on EoE were shown to be a poor source of valid health care information. Videos by health care providers were a better source of information compared to other sources. This study reiterates the need for higher quality educational videos on EoE by the medical community.
Citation Information
Apurva Bansal, Keerthy Reddy, Rufaat Mando, S. Alvarez-Arango, et al.. "Youtube and Eosinophilic Esophagitis: an Assessment of the Educational Quality of Information" Johnson City, TNAppalachian Student Research Forum (2017)
Available at: