Skip to main content
Article
Perceived Fairness of Revenue Management in the US Golf Industry
Articles and Chapters
  • Sheryl E. Kimes, Cornell University School of Hotel Administration
  • Jochen Wirtz, National University of Singapore
Publication Date
1-1-2003
Abstract

Experience in other industries has shown that revenue management can increase revenue without affecting customer satisfaction. Revenue management, however, is underutilized in the golf industry, as customers are believed to perceive such practices as unacceptable and unfair. This paper explores six revenue management practices that might be suitable in a golf context and examines their perceived fairness. The results show that golfers perceive arrival duration control practices in the form of reservation fees or no-show fees as fair. In addition, it was found that golfers perceive demand-based pricing in the form of coupons (two for the price of one), time-of-day and reduced tee time intervals as fair. Conversely, time-of-booking pricing was perceived as neutral to slightly unfair. Varying price levels were seen as unfair, with potential negative consumer reactions to this practice. Furthermore, the paper explores whether framing demand-based pricing as discounts rather than surcharges would make a difference. It was found that demand-based pricing presented as discounts were generally seen as fairer and therefore less likely to have a negative impact on consumer perceptions and reactions.

Comments

Required Publisher Statement
© Palgrave Macmillan. Final version published as: Kimes, S. E., & Wirtz, J. (2003). Perceived fairness of revenue management in the U.S. golf industry. Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management, 1, 332-344. doi:10.1057/palgrave.rpm.5170037 Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.

Citation Information

Kimes, S. E., & Wirtz, J. (2003). Perceived fairness of revenue management in the US golf industry[Electronic version]. Retrieved [insert date], from Cornell University, SHA School site: http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/848