Skip to main content
Article
Race and Recalcitrance: The Miller-El Remands
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
  • Sheri Johnson, Cornell Law School
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2007
Keywords
  • Racial bias,
  • Jurors,
  • Batson v. Kentucky,
  • Miller-El Remands,
  • Peremptory challenges,
  • Juror selection,
  • Voir dire
Abstract

In Batson v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court held that a prosecutor may not peremptorily challenge a juror based upon his or her race. Although Baston was decided more than twenty years ago, some lower courts still resist its command. Three recent cases provide particularly egregious examples of that resistance. The Fifth Circuit refused the Supreme Court's instruction in Miller-El v. Cockrell, necessitating a second grant of certiorari in Miller-El v. Dretke. The court then reversed and remanded four lower court cases for reconsideration in light of Miller-El, but in two cases the lower courts have thus far considered, those courts have obstinately refused to follow the directives of Miller-El. This article demonstrates that both of those cases, Hightower v. Terry and Snyder v. Louisiana, reflect race-based resistance to the Supreme Court, considers possible sources of that resistance, as well as steps likely to eradicate or at least ameliorate such resistance.

Publication Citation
Published in: Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 5, no. 1 (Fall 2007).
Citation Information
Sheri Johnson. "Race and Recalcitrance: The Miller-El Remands" (2007)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/sheri_johnson/28/