Skip to main content
Other
Case studies to enhance online student evaluation: Bond University – Surveying students online to improve learning and teaching
Measuring and improving student course engagement and learning success through online student evaluation systems
  • Shelley Kinash, Bond University
  • Vishen Naidu, Bond University
  • Madelaine Judd, Bond University
  • Melanie Fleming, Bond University
  • Julie Fleming, Central Queensland University
  • Sid Nair, University of Western Australia
  • Elizabeth Santhanam, Australian Catholic University
  • Beatrice Tucker, Curtin University
  • Marian Tulloch, Charles Sturt University
Date of this Version
11-18-2015
Document Type
Research Report
Publication Details

Kinash, S., Naidu, V., Judd, M-M., Fleming, M., Fleming, J., Nair, S., Santhanam, E., Tucker, B., & Tulloch, M. (2015). Case studies to enhance online student evaluation: Bond University – Surveying students online to improve learning and teaching, 1-8. Sydney, Australia: Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching.

Access the website

Copyright © The Authors, 2015

ISBN
978-1-76028-243-1
Abstract
Extract: One of the most sensible ways of improving learning and teaching is to ask the students for feedback. At the end of each teaching period (i.e. semester or term) all universities and many schools survey their students. Usually these surveys are managed online. Questions ask for student perceptions about teaching, assessment and workload. The survey administrators report four common problems. First, response rates are low. This means that valid and reliable conclusions cannot be drawn from the data. Second, students seldom take the time to write comments. It is comments that provide the necessary substance for meaningful change. Third, the questions are usually focussed on teaching and teachers rather than learners and the learning experience. As a result, student evaluation is usually applied only to teachers’ annual reviews rather than to quality improvement of education. Fourth and as a consequence of the first three concerns, student evaluation rarely results in closing-the-loop. Closingthe- loop means that action is taken, the student feedback is applied to make meaningful changes and these improvements are clearly reported back to the students. This article reports what Bond University did to resolve these four problems of response rates, student comments, question content and application to reported quality improvement.
Distribution License
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0
Citation Information
Shelley Kinash, Vishen Naidu, Madelaine Judd, Melanie Fleming, et al.. "Case studies to enhance online student evaluation: Bond University – Surveying students online to improve learning and teaching" Measuring and improving student course engagement and learning success through online student evaluation systems (2015) p. 1 - 8
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/shelley_kinash/173/