Skip to main content
Article
The Anticanonical Lesson of Huckleberry Finn
UF Law Faculty Publications
  • Sharon E. Rush, University of Florida Levin College of Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-1-2002
Abstract
Some books included in the canon of American literature no longer belong there, because they presently lack normative approval. Adapting concepts found in constitutional law, an anticanon of American literature functions the way the anticanon of constitutional law would operate and explicitly removes books from the canon. In law, the anticanon identifies outdated interpretations of the constitution. In education, it is time to consider removing from the canon and placing in an anticanon books that are inconsistent with multicultural education. One such book is Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn, which is part of the canon of American literature and viewed as the "quintessentially American book." However, because most teachers do not question the view that the novel is antiracist, they are unable to present it in a way that promotes multicultural education even though they think they are accomplishing this goal by studying the book. The value of Huckleberry Finn is not that it is an antiracist novel worthy of canonization. Rather, the value of Huckleberry Finn lies in its anticanonical lesson: White society should no longer accept the normative value of the novel's message, a message that is far more complex and racist than whites understand.
Citation Information
Sharon E. Rush, The Anticanonical Lesson of Huckleberry Finn, 11 Cornell J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 577 (2002), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/112