![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/JWi6EIwHuRSKWuhNm1Jqzpw5CK8=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/13/a4/49/13a4491e-c7bc-42ff-a0f7-4747190b4f96/thumbnail_48be9615-c5e3-4d87-a0e5-a05966c405fd.jpg)
Article
Minimum standards of clinical practice for physiotherapists working in critical care settings in Australia and New Zealand: A modified Delphi technique
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice: an international journal of physical therapy
Year of Publication
2016
Keywords
- Delphi technique; Critical Care; Physiotherapy; Professional Competence; Education
Disciplines
Link to Publisher Version (URL)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09593985.2016.1145311
Citation Information
Elizabeth Skinner, Peter Thomas, Julia C. Reeve and Shane Patman. "Minimum standards of clinical practice for physiotherapists working in critical care settings in Australia and New Zealand: A modified Delphi technique" Physiotherapy Theory and Practice: an international journal of physical therapy Vol. 32 Iss. 6 (2016) ISSN: 0959-3985 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/shane-patman/66/
Objective: Achieving competency in critical care in entry-level physiotherapy courses across Australia and New Zealand is not essential, and accredited training for qualified physiotherapists working in critical care units is lacking. As a result, practice standards and training may vary. The objective was to establish consensus-based minimum clinical practice standards for physiotherapists working in critical care settings in Australia and New Zealand.
Design: A modified Delphi technique, which consisted of three rounds of questionnaires, was used to obtain consensus on items.
Setting: Australian and New Zealand care settings
Participants: A panel (n=61) was invited from a pool of eligible physiotherapists throughout Australia and New Zealand (n=93). Eligibility criteria were defined a-priori on the basis of possession of expertise and experience in the practice and teaching of critical care physiotherapy clinical skills
Main Outcome Measure: Questionnaires were disseminated electronically (either via email, or SurveyMonkey®). Items were designated by participants as being ‘Essential/Unsure/Not Essential’. Consensus for inclusion was achieved when items were ranked ‘Essential’ by more than 70% of participants.
Results: Fifty physiotherapists consented and participated in the initial Delphi round, of whom forty-five (90%) completed all rounds. Consensus was reached on 199 (89%) items. The panel agreed that 132 (58%) items were ‘Essential’ items for inclusion in the final framework.
Conclusions: This is the first study to develop a consensus framework of minimum standards of practice for physiotherapists working in critical care. The clinical utility of this framework now requires assessment