Skip to main content
Unpublished Paper
Paying for Pollution? How General Equilibrium Effects Undermine the 'Spare the Air' Program
  • Steven E Sexton, University of California - Berkeley

Policy-makers have relied on non-coercive mechanisms to achieve socially optimal outcomes in a variety of contexts when prices fail to ration scarce resources. Amid heightened concern about environmental damage and climate change, public appeals for cooperation and pecuniary incentives are frequently used to achieve resource conservation and other prosocial behavior. Yet the relative effectiveness of these two instruments is poorly understood when pecuniary incentives are small. This paper examines the extent to which free transit fares and appeals for car trip avoidance reduce car pollution on smoggy days. Using data on freeway traffic volumes and transit ridership, public appeals for cooperation are shown to have no significant effect on car trip demand. Free transit fares, however, do have a significant effect on car trip demand. But the effect is perverse in that it generates an increase in car trips and related pollution. Free fares also increase transit ridership. These results suggest that free transit rides do not induce motorists to substitute to transit, but instead subsidize regular transit rides and additional trips. Appeals for cooperation have no affect on carpooling behavior.

  • pollution,
  • ozone,
  • smog,
  • conservation,
  • trip demand,
  • altruism,
  • public good
Publication Date
Spring March 1, 2011
Citation Information
Steven E Sexton. "Paying for Pollution? How General Equilibrium Effects Undermine the 'Spare the Air' Program" (2011)
Available at: