Skip to main content
Other
Extract from Glazer and FitzGibbon on Legal Opinions (3d ed. Cum. Supp. 2009) citing Bigler & Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law
(2009)
  • Seth Barrett Tillman, None
Abstract

This is an extract from Glazer and FitzGibbon on Legal Opinions citing Bigler & Tillman's Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law.

See Glazer and FitzGibbon Section 10.6 ("For an excellent article that analyzes the application of Delaware case law to many of the issues discussed in this section, see Bigler & TIllman, Void or Voidable? -- Curing Defects in Stock Issuances Under Delaware Law ....").

See Glazer and FitzGibbon Section 10.6.4.1 ("Not all stock issuance[s] can be ratified under Delaware law. Stock issuances that are void (as opposed to voidable) cannot be ratified. For a thoughtful discussion of which stock issuances are void and which merely voidable, see Bigler & Tillman, supra ....").

[August 1, 2010]

Disciplines
Publication Date
February 15, 2009
Citation Information
Donald W. Glazer et al., Glazer and FitzGibbon on Legal Opinions §§ 10.6, 10.6.4.1, at 52-53 (3d ed. Cum. Supp. 2009), available at http://works.bepress.com/seth_barrett_tillman/145/.