A Negative Retrospective of Rule 2392 New York University Law Review (2017)
This symposium contribution offers a negative retrospective of Rule 23 through six decades of rulemaking. Rather than focus on what was, I consider what was not: major amendment proposals that failed to become law. This negative retrospective projects a dramatically different vision of Rule 23, and it offers insights into both the Rule 23 of today and the rulemaking process more generally.
- advisory committee,
- rule 23,
- class actions
Citation InformationScott Dodson. "A Negative Retrospective of Rule 23" 92 New York University Law Review (2017)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/scott_dodson/51/