Skip to main content
Article
Identifying Workflow Disruptions in the Cardiovascular Operating Room
Anaesthesia (2016)
  • T. N. Cohen
  • J. S. Cabrera
  • O. D. Sisk
  • K. L. Welsh
  • J. H. Abernathy, Medical University of South Carolina
  • S. T. Reeves
  • D. A. Wiegmann
  • S. A. Shappell, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
  • A. J. Boquet
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to identify the frequency and nature of flow disruptions in the operating room with respect to three cardiac surgical team members: anaesthetists; circulating nurses; and perfusionists. Data collected from 15 cases and coded using a human factors taxonomy identified 878 disruptions. Significant differences were identified in frequency relative to discipline type. Circulating nurses experienced more coordination disruptions (v2 (2, N = 110) = 7.136, p < 0.028) and interruptions (v2 (2, N = 427) = 29.743, p = 0.001) than anaesthetists and perfusionists, whereas anaesthetists and perfusionists experienced more layout issues than circulating nurses (v2 (2, N = 153) = 48.558, p = 0.001). Time to resolve disruptions also varied among disciplines (k (12, 878) = 5.186, p = 0.000). Although most investigations take a one-size fits all approach in addressing disruptions to flow, this study demonstrates that targeted interventions must focus on differences with respect to individual role.
Keywords
  • quality measures in patient care,
  • root cause analysis,
  • essential elements,
  • operating room disruptions,
  • cardiovascular surgery
Publication Date
August, 2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13521
Citation Information
T. N. Cohen, J. S. Cabrera, O. D. Sisk, K. L. Welsh, et al.. "Identifying Workflow Disruptions in the Cardiovascular Operating Room" Anaesthesia Vol. 71 Iss. 8 (2016) p. 948 - 954 ISSN: 0003-2409
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/scott-shappell/5/