Skip to main content
Article
U.S. Naval Aviation Mishaps, 1977-92: Differences Between Single- and Dual-Piloted Aircraft
Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine (1996)
  • Scott A. Shappell, Naval Aerospace Medical Institute
  • Douglas A. Wiegmann
Abstract
The present study examined U.S. Naval aircraft mishap trends between January 1977 and December 1992 using all Class A, B, and C mishaps. Results of this investigation revealed that mishaps attributable to both human error and mechanical/environmental factors have declined steadily over the past 16 years, although mishaps attributed to human error have declined at a much slower rate. For those mishaps attributed to human error, differences were observed between single- and dual-piloted aircraft when phase-of-flight (takeoff, in-flight, landing)
and time-of-day were evaluated. For single-piloted aircraft, in-flight mishaps constituted the highest proportion of mishaps during the day (>55%), while landing mishaps constituted the highest proportion of mishaps during the evening and night (43-65%). For dual-piloted aircraft, no consistent variation was evident for phase-of-flight and time-of-day. In-flight (approx. 55%) mishaps constituted the highest proportion of mishaps across all times of day, followed by landing (approx. 35%), and takeoff (approx. 10%) mishaps. These data support focused rather than global investigations of aviation mishaps.
Keywords
  • aviation accidents,
  • human error,
  • human factors,
  • accident investigation,
  • Naval aviation,
  • mechanical/environmental factors,
  • aviation mishaps
Publication Date
January, 1996
Citation Information
Scott A. Shappell and Douglas A. Wiegmann. "U.S. Naval Aviation Mishaps, 1977-92: Differences Between Single- and Dual-Piloted Aircraft" Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine Vol. 67 Iss. 1 (1996) p. 65 - 69 ISSN: 0095-6562
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/scott-shappell/39/