Skip to main content
Article
Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity
Academy of Management Journal
  • Scott L. Martin, Zayed University
  • Hui Liao, Robert H. Smith School of Business
  • Elizabeth M. Campbell, Robert H. Smith School of Business
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2013
Abstract

Using a field experiment in the United Arab Emirates, we compared the impacts of directive and empowering leadership on customer-rated core task proficiency and proactive behaviors. Results of tests for main effects demonstrated that both directive and empowering leadership increased work unit core task proficiency, but only empowering leadership increased proactive behaviors. Examination of boundary conditions revealed that directive leadership enhanced proactive behaviors for work units that were highly satisfied with their leaders, whereas empowering leadership had stronger effects on both core task proficiency and proactive behaviors for work units that were less satisfied with their leaders. We discuss implications for both theory and practice. © Academy of Management Journal.

Publisher
Academy of Management
Disciplines
Scopus ID
84886821518
Indexed in Scopus
Yes
Open Access
No
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0113
Citation Information
Scott L. Martin, Hui Liao and Elizabeth M. Campbell. "Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity" Academy of Management Journal Vol. 56 Iss. 5 (2013) p. 1372 - 1395 ISSN: <a href="https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/issn/0001-4273" target="_blank">0001-4273</a>
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/scott-l-martin/3/