Skip to main content
Paying the IRS Whistleblower: A Critical Analysis of Collected Proceeds
Virginia Tax Review
  • Karie Davis-Nozemack, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Sarah J. Webber, University of Dayton
Document Type
Publication Date
Congressional changes to the IRS Whistleblower Program were intended to induce more participation in the program by allowing larger incentives and greater certainty that whistleblowers would be paid. Since the Program was amended, tax whistleblower tips have increased 76 percent1 and revenue collected due to whistleblowers has increased 79 percent.2 Despite a rise in tips and revenue collected, whistleblower payments have not increased. In fact, the number of tax whistleblower awards paid has decreased 44 percent.3 We hypothesize that this trend is due to the administration of the program but also to the interpretation of “collected proceeds.” Collected proceeds are tax revenues collected due to a specific whistleblower tip and comprise the pool of money from which a tax whistleblower award is made. While scholarship exists examining the Whistleblower Program amendments and their effects, no scholar has critically examined the crux of the Whistleblower Program: what should constitute collected proceeds.
Inclusive pages
Document Version

This document is available for download with pending permission from the publisher. Permission documentation is on file.

University of Virginia School of Law
Peer Reviewed
Citation Information
Karie Davis-Nozemack and Sarah J. Webber. "Paying the IRS Whistleblower: A Critical Analysis of Collected Proceeds" Virginia Tax Review Vol. 32 (2012)
Available at: