Skip to main content
Article
Combining Accuracy Assessment of Land-Cover Maps with Environmental Monitoring Programs
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
  • Stephen V. Stehman, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
  • Raymond L. Czaplewski, United States Department of Agriculture
  • Sarah M. Nusser, Iowa State University
  • Limin Yang, United States Geological Survey
  • Zhiliang Zhu, United States Geological Survey
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2000
DOI
10.1023/A:1006487829238
Abstract

A scientifically valid accuracy assessment of a large-area, land-cover map is expensive. Environmental monitoring programs offer a potential source of data to partially defray the cost of accuracy assessment while still maintaining the statistical validity. In this article, three general strategies for combining accuracy assessment and environmental monitoring protocols are described. These strategies range from a fully integrated accuracy assessment and environmental monitoring protocol, to one in which the protocols operate nearly independently. For all three strategies, features critical to using monitoring data for accuracy assessment include compatibility of the land-cover classification schemes, precisely co-registered sample data, and spatial and temporal compatibility of the map and reference data. Two monitoring programs, the National Resources Inventory (NRI) and the Forest Inventory and Monitoring (FIM), are used to illustrate important features for implementing a combined protocol.

Comments

This article is from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 64 (2000): 115–126, doi:10.1023/A:1006487829238.

Rights
Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The content of this document is not copyrighted.
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Citation Information
Stephen V. Stehman, Raymond L. Czaplewski, Sarah M. Nusser, Limin Yang, et al.. "Combining Accuracy Assessment of Land-Cover Maps with Environmental Monitoring Programs" Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Vol. 64 Iss. 1 (2000) p. 115 - 126
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/sarah_nusser/5/