Skip to main content
Article
Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals
Journal of Nursing Scholarship (2010)
  • M.M. Shattell
  • P. Chinn
  • Sandra Thomas
  • W.R. Cowling
Abstract

This study examined the quality of peer review in three scholarly nursing journals from the perspectives of authors and editors. Specifically, the study examined the extent to which manuscript reviews provided constructive guidance for authors to further develop their work for publication, and for editors to make informed and sound decisions on the disposition of manuscripts.

Keywords
  • peer review,
  • publication,
  • scientific writing
Publication Date
2010
Citation Information
Shattell, M.M., Chinn, P., Thomas, S.P., & Cowling, W.R. (2010). Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 42, 58-65.