Skip to main content
The effect of conversational agent skill on user behavior during deception
Computers in Human Behavior
  • Ryan M. Schuetzler, University of Nebraska at Omaha
  • G. Mark Grimes, University of Houston
  • Justin Scott Giboney, Brigham Young University
Author ORCID Identifier

Ryan M. Schuetzler

Document Type
Publication Date

Conversational agents (CAs) are an integral component of many personal and business interactions. Many recent advancements in CA technology have attempted to make these interactions more natural and human-like. However, it is currently unclear how human-like traits in a CA impact the way users respond to questions from the CA. In some applications where CAs may be used, detecting deception is important. Design elements that make CA interactions more human-like may induce undesired strategic behaviors from human deceivers to mask their deception. To better understand this interaction, this research investigates the effect of conversational skill—that is, the ability of the CA to mimic human conversation—from CAs on behavioral indicators of deception. Our results show that cues of deception vary depending on CA conversational skill, and that increased conversational skill leads to users engaging in strategic behaviors that are detrimental to deception detection. This finding suggests that for applications in which it is desirable to detect when individuals are lying, the pursuit of more human-like interactions may be counter-productive.


© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Citation Information
Ryan M. Schuetzler, G. Mark Grimes and Justin Scott Giboney. "The effect of conversational agent skill on user behavior during deception" Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 97 (2019) p. 250 - 259
Available at: