Skip to main content
Article
[Accepted Article Manuscript Version (Postprint)] Identifying the Complexity of Diagnosing Bipolar Disorder: A Focused Ethnography
Issues in Mental Health Nursing (2019)
  • Anne Fish, University of Missouri-St. Louis
  • Brandie M Stiles
  • Roxanne Vandermause, University of Missouri–St. Louis
  • Azfar Malik
Abstract
Purpose: To identify and describe the complexity of diagnosing bipolar disorder, including the
diagnostic process and patient experiences of being newly diagnosed with bipolar disorder.
Design: A mixed-methods focused ethnography was conducted, grounded in a post-positivist foundation.
Methods: Medical records (n ¼ 100) of patients whose diagnosis had been switched to bipolar disorder were examined. Six weeks post-hospitalization, ten outpatients with the diagnosis of bipolar
disorder underwent an in-depth interview.
Findings: Four diagnostic processes were identified during the retrospective record review. Two
patterns and five themes were identified from the interviews. The first pattern, living with undiagnosed bipolar disorder, demonstrated common experiences of distinguishing impulsive moods
and behavior, suffering life challenges, and seeking relief. The second pattern, acclimating to a
new diagnosis of bipolar disorder, demonstrated participants’ ways of understanding the diagnosis
and reconciling the diagnosis. Patterns in the interviews corroborated data from the
record review.
Conclusions: The rendering of an appropriate diagnosis is key. Many participants’ lives were significantly improved when diagnosis was made, and treatment recommendations for bipolar disorder (BPD) were initiated. These findings offer clinicians and researchers new ways to think about
the complexity of the diagnosis of BPD including contrasting decision-making outcomes along a
screening, diagnosis, and treatment continuum, as well as using the diagnostic event to instigate
meaningful life change in the patient.
Disciplines
Publication Date
June 27, 2019
DOI
10.1080/01612840.2019.1615584
Citation Information
Post-Print Publisher Version at http://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2019.1615584
Creative Commons license
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC_BY-NC-ND International License.